Our Approach

Compare the Options

Good decision support starts by helping you see two things clearly: what matters to you, and which options are actually open to you. Once those are clear, comparing the options gets a lot easier.

Queen's University campus in Kingston, Ontario

There is more than one sensible way to do that.

A simple pros-and-cons list can work when you have two choices and only a few things to consider. The worksheet below is a one-page version you can print: two options side by side, the questions worth checking for each, and a place to write down your deal-breakers. Housing decisions often involve many more variables.

A one-page worksheet with Option A and Option B columns for pros, cons and questions to check, and a deal-breakers checklist below.
Pros & Cons Comparison worksheetTwo options side by side, the questions to check for each, and your deal-breakers. Best when you are down to two choices.Download the Word document (.docx)

You may be comparing several buildings, room types or other housing options across cost, privacy, location, facilities, washroom arrangements, community and other factors.

A weighted decision matrix helps organize that complexity.

A spreadsheet with factors down the left, a weight column, three option columns scored from 1 to 5, and weighted totals with a rank for each option.
Simple Weighted Decision MatrixWeight the factors that matter to you, score each option from 1 to 5, and the sheet totals and ranks them.Download the Excel spreadsheet (.xlsx)

The basic idea is straightforward. Factors that matter more to you receive more influence in the comparison. Each housing option is then considered against those factors.

But the matrix is only one view of the decision.

We also want to see the tradeoffs hidden inside the total score. If one option ranks slightly higher than another, what are you actually getting in exchange?

Perhaps you gain privacy but pay more.

Perhaps you save money but accept a location you like less. The map below plots one real set of options by cost against privacy score, so you can see at a glance where the real trade-offs sit: which price jumps buy you noticeably more privacy, and which don't.

A scatter chart with total annual cost in Canadian dollars on the horizontal axis and a privacy score from 2 to 10 on the vertical axis, plotting housing options such as Compact shared, Shared room, Single room, Gage 6-bed, Ritsumeikan 4-bed, Connected single and Single private bath, generally trending toward higher privacy at higher cost.
Privacy vs. Cost Trade-off MapEvery option from one real housing system, plotted by total annual cost and privacy score. Your own school's numbers will differ, but this is what the trade-off looks like once you can see it.

Perhaps two options perform very differently but still end up with almost identical overall results.

Queen's University limestone building in Kingston, Ontario

There are also situations where reducing everything to a single number gives a false impression of certainty. Two options may simply be good in different ways. Methods such as outranking can help us recognize that rather than forcing one of them to appear decisively better.

This is an important principle behind Decidient.

We do not use a method just because we have it.

Different methods answer different questions.

The purpose of comparison is not to manufacture a winner. It is to help you see the differences that matter.

Your Decision Kit brings those comparisons together. You can see which options fit your stated priorities, which ones are close behind and what separates them.

That is far more useful than a list ranked from one to ten with no explanation.

A ranking tells you where the options finished.

Decision support should also tell you why.